← Back to Home

Fixing Inventory and Transfer Control Across Multi-Site Operations

Context

  • 14 operational locations
  • 8,000+ meals produced daily
  • Centralized purchasing with stock moving between locations
  • MarketMan used for purchasing, but no structured transfer system

Inventory existed. Purchasing was tracked.

Movement was not.

Problem

Stock was being purchased correctly.

It just was not being controlled after that.

What we saw:

  • No formal system for tracking transfers between locations
  • Items moving freely without being recorded
  • Locations receiving stock without accountability
  • No consistent method for logging:
  • internal transfers
  • usage outside POS (events, staff meals)
  • MarketMan tracking purchases, but not internal movement

The result:

  • Inventory mismatches across locations
  • Cost leakage through untracked movement
  • No clear ownership of stock
  • Inaccurate food cost calculations
  • Leadership unable to trace where losses were happening

This is where most operations quietly lose money.

System Fix

We did not change purchasing.

We built control over movement.

1. Defined Inventory as a Controlled Asset

Everything purchased becomes inventory.

No exceptions.

Whether:

  • used in production
  • transferred to another location
  • consumed internally

It must be recorded.

2. Introduced Transfer Logging System

Since MarketMan does not handle transfers natively:

  • Built a structured transfer log system
  • Every movement between locations recorded
  • Required fields:
  • item
  • quantity
  • sending location
  • receiving location
  • date

No movement without a record.

3. Linked Transfers to Accountability

  • Sending location records the transfer
  • Receiving location confirms it

This created dual accountability.

No more "we never got that" situations.

4. Captured Non-Sales Consumption

Defined and enforced tracking for:

  • staff meals
  • event usage
  • internal consumption

These were previously invisible.

Now they are part of the system.

5. Integrated with Reporting Structure

Transfers, waste, and consumption tied into daily reporting.

This ensured:

  • inventory movement aligns with operational data
  • discrepancies surface immediately

Result

  • Inventory movement fully traceable across locations
  • Reduction in unaccounted stock loss
  • Improved accuracy in food cost calculations
  • Clear ownership of stock at every location
  • Faster identification of discrepancies

What This Means

Most operations believe inventory control is about purchasing.

It is not.

Control is lost after the purchase.

If you do not track:

  • where stock goes
  • who is responsible
  • how it is used

You do not have inventory control.

You have inventory movement without accountability.

Once movement is controlled, cost becomes predictable.

Without it, loss is guaranteed.